Ex Parte Garnier et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for               
                             publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                                                              
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                               _____________                                                   
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               _____________                                                   
                          Ex parte CHRISTOPHER GARNIER and PASCAL DEBATY                                       
                                               _____________                                                   
                                            Appeal No. 2005-1269                                               
                                          Application No. 09/499,060                                           
                                               ______________                                                  
                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                              _______________                                                  
             Before KRASS, BLANKENSHIP and NAPPI,  Administrative Patent Judges.                               
             KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  

                   This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 9-20, 36, 37,               
             and 40.                                                                                           
                   The invention is directed to a voltage ramp generator, best illustrated by                  
             reference to representative independent claim 9, reproduced as follows:                           
                   9.        An integrated circuit voltage ramp generator produced using CMOS                  
                   technology and comprising:                                                                  
                          a capacitance; and                                                                   

                          a CMOS charging circuit connected to said capacitance and                            
                                                      1                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007