Appeal No. 2005-1278 Page 19 Application No. 10/145,226 The limitation that the base has a plurality of upstanding corner members each having "a contoured surface" and the opposed side walls have a second portion having "a complementary contour for mating with a corresponding contoured surface of the upstanding corner member" as set forth in claim 25 is readable on Jacques '420. In that regard, the posts 240 of Jacques '420 have a curved top wall 242 and a pyramidally shaped integral part 248 which are accommodated by opposite end pieces 218 and 220 when the container is in its erected position shown in Figure 8. The limitation that the opposed sidewalls have "central portion having a substantially smooth, non-apertured inner surface'' as set forth in claim 28 is readable on Jacques '420. In that regard, the solid portion between the two rows of apertures of each side piece 214 and 216 of Jacques '420 is a central portion of the side wall with a substantially smooth, non-apertured inner surface. The limitation that the opposed sidewalls have "a plurality of apertures in the peripheral portion" as set forth in claim 29 is readable on Jacques '420 since the two rows of apertures of each side piece 214 and 216 surround the solid portion therebetween.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007