Appeal No. 2005-1279
Application No. 09/924,285 Page 6
As the examiner’s application of Schneider does not cure the
foregoing shortcomings of Nennecker and Gumery, we also shall not
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent
claim 22, and dependent claims 11, 28 and 30, as being
unpatentable over Nennecker in view of Schneider or the standing
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of independent claim 22, and
dependent claims 11, 23 through 26, 31 and 32, as being
unpatentable over Gumery in view of Schneider.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 32
is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)) BOARD OF PATENT
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007