The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROGER G. M. LUCASSEN and MICHEL M. SPRONK
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1293
Application No. 09/453,480
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before FRANKFORT, MCQUADE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 4, 6, 7,
11 and 13 through 15, all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 1 through 3,
5, 8 through 10 and 12 have been cancelled.
Appellants’ invention relates to a cushioning conversion machine for converting
sheet stock material into a cushioning dunnage product and to a method for controlling
the formation of the dunnage product during a cutting operation to minimize machine
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007