Ex Parte MISZCZAK et al - Page 1




                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  



                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                               
                                                         ____________                                                                

                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                            ____________                                                             
                               Ex parte EDWARD S. MISZCZAK and MILENA KRILIC-ANDAN                                                   
                                                           ____________                                                              
                                                       Appeal No. 2005-1378                                                          
                                                    Application No. 09/227,242                                                       

                                                           ____________                                                              
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                           ____________                                                              
               Before PAK, OWENS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
               PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                     


                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                               
               rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 8 and 11.1  Claims 4, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 through 20 were                                 
               objected to as being dependent on a rejected base claim, but indicated to be allowable “if                            
               rewritten in independent form, including all of the limitations of the base claim and any                             

                       1 The examiner has withdrawn the Section 112 rejection of claims 9, 10, 12, 13, 16, 23, 24, 26 and            
               27 set forth in the Office action dated April 8, 2003.  See the Answer, page 3.    Thus, these claims are no          
               longer subject of this appeal.                                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007