Ex Parte Traylor - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1393                                                        
          Application No. 09/751,609                                                  

               The examiner relies upon the following reference as evidence           
          of obviousness:                                                             
          Nagy                        3,729,158               Apr. 24, 1973           
               Appellant's claimed invention is directed to a paintbrush              
          holder comprising a magnet that engages a ferrule of the                    
          paintbrush.  The holder also comprises a resilient member having            
          a proximal portion attached to a clamp which engages the paint              
          can, and a distal portion that is attached to the magnet.  The              
          resilient member possesses a force constant which produces                  
          displacement of its distal portion when the paintbrush is                   
          subjected to mechanical shock such that the brush does not slide            
          off the magnet.                                                             
               Appealed claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)           
          as being unpatentable over Nagy.                                            
               Appellant submits that the appealed claims "do not stand or            
          fall together" (page 4 of principal brief, first paragraph).                
          However, only claim 14, and claims 10, 17 and 20 as a group, are            
          separately argued by appellant.  Accordingly, claims 1-9, 11-13,            
          15, 16 and 18-20 stand or fall together, as do claims 10, 17                
          and 20.                                                                     
               We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellant's arguments              
          set forth in the principal and reply briefs on appeal.  However,            

                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007