The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte AMAD TAYEBI ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1415 Application No. 09/253,174 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 13, 15, and 19 which are all the claims pending in the application. Appellant filed an amendment along with the Reply Brief of April 8, 2004. This amendment has not been entered (Office Communication, June 7, 2004). Therefore, we decide the appeal based on the claims as presented in Appendix A of the Brief filed June 5, 2003 (Brief). We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007