Ex Parte Song et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-1436                                                        
          Application No. 09/771,876                                                  

          suggested by the examiner, and claims 28-38 and 41 stand                    
          withdrawn from consideration, pursuant to a restriction                     
          requirement, as being directed to a non-elected invention.  The             
          claims on appeal relate to an aluminosilicate zeolitic catalyst             
          which contains one or more additional metals, i.e., Fe, Ga, Ti,             
          and/or Co, and also relate to a process for preparing the                   
          catalyst.                                                                   
               Claim 1, which is one of three independent claims, is                  
          representative of the subject matter embodied in the appealed               
          claims.                                                                     
               1.  A catalyst for methylating a naphthalenic                          
               feedstock, said catalyst comprising: a zeolitic material               
               incorporating Al and one or more additional metals selected            
               from the group consisting of Fe, Ga, Ti, and Co, and                   
               mixtures thereof, wherein the ratio of additional metal(s)             
               is between about 1:10 and 2.5:1, and between 5 and 95 weight           
               percent of a binder.                                                   
                                                                                     
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Absil et al. (Absil)           4,837,397            Jun.  6, 1989           
          Suzuki et al. (Suzuki)         4,994,254            Feb. 19, 1991           
          Skeels et al. (Skeels)         5,098,687            Mar. 24, 1992           
          Iwamoto et al. (Iwamoto)       5,207,893            May   4, 1993           
          Farnos et al. (Farnos)         5,614,079            Mar. 25, 1997           
               The following rejections are before us for review:                     
               1.   Claims 1-8, 10-11, 13-19, 21, and 39-40 stand rejected            
          under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite.               
                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007