Appeal No. 2005-1438
Application No. 10/027,433
Thus, we determine that the evidence of obviousness, on
balance, outweighs the evidence of nonobviousness proffered by
the appellants. Hence, we affirm the examiner’s decision
rejecting all the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(effective September 13, 2004; 69 Fed. Reg.
49960 (August 12, 2004); 1286 Off. Gaz. Pat. and TM Office
21 (September 7, 2004)).
AFFIRMED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROMULO H. DELMENDO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CKP:hh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007