Ex Parte Mosher et al - Page 1




                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
                                           is not binding precedent of the Board.                              


                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                  ____________                                                 
              Ex parte RALPH A. MOSHER, T. EDWIN FREEMAN, THEODORE LOVALLO, DAMODAR                            
               M. PAI, JOHN F. YANUS, TIMOTHY J. FULLER, MARKUS R. SILVESTRI, GERALD M.                        
                          FLETCHER, ANTONIO DeCRESCENTIS, IHOR W. TARNAWSKJ                                    
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                              Appeal No. 2005-1451                                             
                                            Application No. 09/833,546                                         
                                                  ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                    
                                                  ____________                                                 
             Before PAK, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
             TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                



                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This appeal involves claims 1 and 3-25.  Claim 26, the only other pending claim, has        
             been withdrawn by the Examiner pursuant to a restriction requirement.  We have jurisdiction       
             over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                      













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007