The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RALPH A. MOSHER, T. EDWIN FREEMAN, THEODORE LOVALLO, DAMODAR M. PAI, JOHN F. YANUS, TIMOTHY J. FULLER, MARKUS R. SILVESTRI, GERALD M. FLETCHER, ANTONIO DeCRESCENTIS, IHOR W. TARNAWSKJ ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1451 Application No. 09/833,546 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, TIMM, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1 and 3-25. Claim 26, the only other pending claim, has been withdrawn by the Examiner pursuant to a restriction requirement. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007