Ex Parte Muller - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2005-1452                                                               Page 2                
              Application No. 09/915,549                                                                               


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                      The present invention relates to a dispersion which comprises an oily phase, an                  
               aqueous phase and at least one active ingredient.  The dispersion can be either an                      
               oil-in-water emulsion or a water-in-oil emulsion.  Representative claim 1 appears                       
               below:                                                                                                  

                      1.  Dispersion which comprises:                                                                  
                      an oily phase;                                                                                   
                      an aqueous phase, in the form of an oil-in-water emulsion or a                                   
                      water-in-oil emulsion; and                                                                       
                      at least one active ingredient that is only slightly or with difficulty soluble                  
                      in the oily phase and the aqueous phase, wherein the dispersion is free                          
                      from toxicologically dangerous organic solvents and contains the active                          
                      ingredient dissolved in a quantity that is greater than the quantity which                       
                      results additively from its maximum solubility in the oily and the aqueous                       
                      phase of the emulsion.                                                                           

                      The Examiner relies on the following references in rejecting the appealed                        
               claims:                                                                                                 
               Kaufman et al. (Kaufman)           5,616,330                          Apr.  01, 1977                    
               Davis et al.  (Davis)              EP 0296845                         Dec.  28, 1988                    
               (Published European Patent Application)                                                                 

                      Claims 1-15, 19-66, 143, 144, 146 and 148-150 stand rejected under            35                 
               U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Davis.  Claims 1-15, 19-66, 143, 144, 146 and                           
               148-150  stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)  as obvious over Kaufman.                              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007