Appeal No. 2005-1485 Application No. 10/317,040 suggested the desirability, and thus the obviousness, of using the claimed plate made of color-producing metal or metal oxide in a cut gemstone coloring method. See In re Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1343-44, 61 USPQ2d 1430, 1434 (Fed. Cir. 2002). (“This factual question of motivation is material to patentability, and could not be resolved on subjective belief and unknown authority”); see also In re Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 999, 50 USPQ2d 1614, 1617 (Fed. Cir. 1999)(“[T]he best defense against the subtle but powerful attraction of a hindsight-based obviousness analysis is rigorous application of the requirement for a showing of the teaching or motivation to combine prior art references”). 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007