Ex Parte Rauch et al - Page 5



         Appeal No. 2005-1485                                                       
         Application No. 10/317,040                                                 


         suggested the desirability, and thus the obviousness, of using the         
         claimed plate made of color-producing metal or metal oxide in a cut        
         gemstone coloring method.  See In re Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1343-44,          
         61 USPQ2d 1430, 1434 (Fed. Cir. 2002).  (“This factual question of         
         motivation is material to patentability, and could not be resolved         
         on subjective belief and unknown authority”); see also In re               
         Dembiczak, 175 F.3d 994, 999, 50 USPQ2d 1614, 1617 (Fed. Cir.              
         1999)(“[T]he best defense against the subtle but powerful                  
         attraction of a hindsight-based obviousness analysis is rigorous           
         application of the requirement for a showing of the teaching or            
         motivation to combine prior art references”).                              













                                         5                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007