The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FRANCOIS LAPIERRE _____________ Appeal No. 2005-1487 Application No. 10/383,781 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WARREN, WALTZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 and 10, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to a dyed fabric blend of aramid and flame resistant (FR) cellulosic fibers having improved abrasion resistance and thermal shrinkage properties (Brief, page 2). Appellant states that claims 9 andPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007