Ex Parte Sung et al - Page 1






                                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                          
                                  today was not written for publication and is not binding                                           
                                  precedent of the Board.                                                                            
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                             Ex parte KUNG-LIANG KEVIN SUNG                                                          
                                                  and JYH-YAO RAPHAEL LI                                                             
                                                         ______________                                                              
                                                      Appeal No. 2005-1574                                                           
                                                      Application 09/753,428                                                         
                                                        _______________                                                              
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                        _______________                                                              
               Before WARREN, KRATZ and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  
                                                        Decision on Appeal                                                           
                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally                             
               rejecting claims 21 through 24.  Claim 25 is also of record and has been withdrawn from                               
               consideration by the examiner under 37 CFR § 1.142(b).                                                                
                       Claim 211 illustrates appellants’ invention of a synthetic wood-like product having an                        
               external foam skin and a foam core, and is representative of the claims on appeal:                                    
                       21.  A synthetic wood-like product having an external foam skin and a foam core, and                          
               being of low density, stable dimension, wood-like surface quality, good flammability resistance                       
               and outdoor weather durability, made by the method that comprises:                                                    
                       A.)  forming a mixture containing:                                                                            
                       (a)  about 70 to about 100 parts by weight of vinyl chloride resin;                                           
                                                                                                                                    
               1  We have copied claim 21 as it stands of record in the amendment filed June 23, 2003.  See the                      
               paragraph bridging pages 2-3 of the answer.                                                                           

                                                            - 1 -                                                                    



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007