Ex Parte Cho et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                 is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                     Ex parte KWANTAI CHO, CLIFTON J. DELOZIER,                                                 
                                           LINUS I. HOLSTEIN, ALLEN PITTMAN,                                                    
                                     CHARLES J. RUNKLE, and AMITAVA SENGUPTA                                                    
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                     Appeal No. 2005-1608                                                       
                                                   Application No. 10/424,327                                                   
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                           
               Before GARRIS, PAK, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                      This appeal involves claims 1-20 which are all the claims pending in the application.  We                 
               have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                   















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007