Appeal No. 2005-1636
Application No. 09/726,272
In summary, we have sustained the examiner’s rejection of
the claims on appeal with respect to claims 37, 47-49, 59-61,
71 and 72, but we have not sustained the rejection with respect
to claims 38-46, 50-58 and 62-70. Therefore, the decision of the
examiner rejecting claims 37-72 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/hh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007