Appeal No. 2005-1675 Page 15 Application No. 09/523,503 CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 8 to 13, 15 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Whiteside is affirmed; and the decision of the examiner to reject claims 8 to 13 and 16 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by White is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge )Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007