The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte D. MORGAN TENCH and JOHN T. WHITE _____________ Appeal No. 2005-1680 Application No. 10/012,079 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CAROFF, PAK and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-23, all the pending claims in appellants' involved application. All the appealed claims are directed to a cell assembly for electroplating a semiconductor wafer. Claim 1, the broadest of three independent claims, is illustrative of the subject matter embraced by the claims on appeal:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007