Appeal No. 2005-1710 Application No. 10/057,474 paragraph). However, as noted by appellants, the sections of Kingsley cited by the examiner utterly fail to provide any teaching of improved heat aging. In conclusion, it is our judgment that the evidence of nonobviousness presented by appellants outweighs the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner. Accordingly, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is reversed. REVERSED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:clm -5-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007