Ex Parte Badugu et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                
          of the Board.                                                               


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte UJWAL RAO BADUGU,                               
                              SRIKANTAPPA RAVI KUMAR,                                 
                               SHRIRAM K. SUBRAMANIAN,                                
                                 and JERRY GENE WOOD                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2005-1781                                  
                               Application 09/860,407                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       
          Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and BARRETT, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from            
          the examiner’s rejection of claims 11-15 and 28-34, which                   
          constitute all the claims pending in this application.                      

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007