Ex Parte Garske - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2005-1815                                                        
          Application No. 10/057,719                                                  

               29. A method of inserting a golf cup sleeve into a golf cup,           
          the method comprising:                                                      
               placing a one-piece, seamless cylindrical golf cup sleeve              
          into a golf cup; and                                                        
               releasing the golf cup sleeve so that an outer surface of              
          the golf cup sleeve is forced against an inner surface of the               
          golf cup and an inner surface of the golf cup sleeve does not               
          interfere with a golf ball dropping within the golf cup.                    
                                    THE EVIDENCE                                      
               The items relied upon by the examiner as evidence of                   
          obviousness are:                                                            
          Hageman                       5,362,044        Nov. 08, 1994                
          Browne                        5,382,018        Jan. 17, 1995                
          Crocker et al. (Crocker)        355,171        Aug. 20, 1931                
          (British Patent Document)                                                   
          Boyd                          2,206,804        Jan. 18, 1989                
          (British Patent Document)                                                   
               The item relied upon by the appellant as evidence of non-              
          obviousness is:                                                             
          The 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 declaration of Stephen J. Garske filed                
          December 16, 2002.                                                          
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 9, 11, 12, 22, 25, 27 and 29 stand rejected under            
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boyd in view of               
          Browne.                                                                     

                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007