The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PETER GEIGER, MANUEL J. ALVAREZ II, and THOMAS A. DYE ____________ Appeal No. 2005-1853 Application No. 09/915,751 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 17 through 22, 25 through 28, 33 through 45, 55 through 76, 78 through 89, 93 through 117 and 125 through 134. The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for managing memory storage.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007