The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PETER GEIGER, MANUEL J. ALVAREZ II,
and THOMAS A. DYE
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1853
Application No. 09/915,751
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 17 through 22, 25
through 28, 33 through 45, 55 through 76, 78 through 89, 93 through 117 and 125 through
134.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for managing memory
storage.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007