Ex Parte Geiger et al - Page 1




                             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                         


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        

                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                     
                                 Ex parte PETER GEIGER, MANUEL J. ALVAREZ II,                                          
                                                 and THOMAS A. DYE                                                     
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                 Appeal No. 2005-1853                                                  
                                              Application No. 09/915,751                                               
                                                     ____________                                                      
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                     ____________                                                      
              Before HAIRSTON, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                   



                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 9, 17 through 22, 25               
              through 28, 33 through 45, 55 through 76, 78 through 89, 93 through 117 and 125 through                  
              134.                                                                                                     
                     The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for managing memory                        
              storage.                                                                                                 









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007