The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KARL-HEINZ DÖRNER, HUBERT EHBING,
CHRISTIAN HÄßLER, JÜRGEN RAMTHUN, GUNTHER STOLLWERCK,
ROBERT EIBEN, MICHAEL NIEDERMEYER and PETER SCHUSTER
_____________
Appeal No. 2005-1856
Application No. 10/047,365
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WARREN and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-8.
This appealed subject matter relates to a solar module
comprising a solar cell and a front side composed of transparent
polyurethane. This appealed subject matter is adequately
illustrated by claim 1 (the sole independent claim before us)
which reads as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007