Ex Parte Williams - Page 1




                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                            
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                           

                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                       ____________                                                          
                                              Ex parte ROLAND E. WILLIAMS                                                    
                                                       ____________                                                          
                                                   Appeal No. 2005-1948                                                      
                                                 Application No. 10/020,572                                                  
                                                       ____________                                                          
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                       ____________                                                          
              Before HAIRSTON, SAADAT, and MacDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                          
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                         


                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9 through 29.                                     
                      The disclosed invention relates to a method and machine for disambiguating                             
              among two or more symbols associated with a key via the use of a first type of key                             
              actuation and a second type of key actuation.                                                                  
                      Claim 9 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                             
                      9.  A method for disambiguating among two or more symbols associated with a                            
              key, the method comprising:                                                                                    
                             detecting a first type of actuation of the key;                                                 
                             in response to the detecting of the first type of actuation, displaying a                       
              representation of the two or more symbols;                                                                     
                             detecting a second type of actuation of the key; and                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007