The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte DAVID M. PAYNE and C. TROY JENSEN _____________ Appeal No. 2005-1957 Application No. 10/000,976 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WALTZ, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 6, 10 and 15 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated May 7, 2004, entered as per the Advisory Action dated July 1, 2004). Claims 1, 6, 10 and 15 are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007