The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANURAG PRAKASH
____________
Appeal No. 2005-1975
Application No. 09/819,292
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims1 1, 4-7, 9, 10, 12-14, 16, 18, 19, 25-27 and 2
30-35, which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1 An amendment (August 26, 2003) filed subsequent to the final rejection
(May 15, 2003), has been denied entry by the examiner (brief, page 2).
2 The examiner (answer, pages 2 and 3) has withdrawn the rejection of
claims 27, 33 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. Accordingly,
only claim 30 remains before us for decision on appeal with respect to 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph. As claims 33 and 34 have not been rejected
over prior art, claims 33 and 34 are not before us for decision on appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007