Appeal No. 2005-1980 Page 7 Application No. 10/373,385 that we cannot sustain the examiner's rejections of claims 1 and 31, and claims 2 to 15 and 32 to 36 dependent thereon.3 3We have also reviewed the reference to Mansfield applied in the rejection of claims 7 and 8 but find nothing therein which makes up for the deficiencies of Lencoski and Waechter discussed above.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007