Ex Parte Whisenant - Page 16


                 Appeal No. 2005-2178                                                                                                                  
                 Application 09/969,882                                                                                                                

                          Appellant responds that Geraldson does not disclose that the fertilizer mixture is                                           
                 coextensive with the upper surface of the growing medium as the reference requires that the                                           
                 fertilizer is separate from the location of the plant roots (reply brief, page 6).                                                    
                          On this record, we agree with the examiner.  We found above that Geraldson would have                                        
                 taught that fertilizer mixture 17 is placed as a band at the side of the plant openings 6 so that salt                                
                 deposits will form away from the roots of plant 10 (see above pp. 6-7), and that Whisenant                                            
                 would have taught that confinement of the foots in cup-shaped, root confining growing partition                                       
                 32 will keep the mineral or salt deposits formed in the plant nutrient medium from affecting the                                      
                 growth of the plant (see above p. 8).  Thus, not only would Whisenant have taught one of                                              
                 ordinary skill in the art that partition 32 would confine the roots but also that the partition would                                 
                 further keep the salt deposits away therefrom.  On this record, we determine that one of ordinary                                     
                 skill in this art would have modified the container reservoir of Geraldson with root confining                                        
                 partition 32 for the plants to be grown would have further provided growth medium, including                                          
                 fertilizer, around the partition as suggested by Whisenant in the reasonable expectation of                                           
                 confining the roots and protect the roots from mineral and salt deposits.                                                             
                          On this record, we determine that it would not have been unexpected by one of ordinary                                       
                 skill in this art that the number of growing partitions inserted into the container reservoir of                                      
                 Geraldson in preparing it for planting following the combined teachings of Geraldson and                                              
                 Whisenant, for the number of seedling expected to be planted for one season or session, were not                                      
                 all used because of the unplanned unavailability or health of the seedlings intended to be planted.                                   
                 Thus, in this instance, the reservoir container would in fact have a residual amount of fertilizer                                    
                 and potting mix remaining which would have led this person to plant an additional batch of                                            
                 seedlings in the unused growing partitions in a second growing season or session in the                                               
                 reasonable expectation of economically utilizing the residual amount of fertilizers and potting                                       
                 mix remaining in the reservoir container after harvesting the plants grown in the first season or                                     
                 session.  See generally Pro-Mold, 75 F.3d at 1573, 37 USPQ at 1629-30.                                                                
                          Therefore, we determine that one of ordinary skill in this art routinely following the                                       
                 combined teachings of Geraldson, Tisdale and Whisenant would have reasonably arrived at the                                           
                 claimed method encompassed by appealed claims 14 and 17, including each and every limitation                                          


                                                                        - 16 -                                                                         



Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007