Ex Parte Orocio et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2192                                                        
          Application No. 10/047,865                                                  

          annular inlet ring mounted on said shroud where said annular                
          inlet ring and said sleeve are on opposite sides of said shroud             
          and protrude in opposite directions from said shroud, whereby               
          during rotation of said impeller smooth, efficient substantially            
          noise-free operation is obtained because said sleeve is in                  
          balance with said annular inlet ring.                                       
               2. A pump impeller comprising:                                         
               a series of vanes having an outer end which is                         
          integrally mounted on a shroud, said shroud having a centrally              
          located annular inlet ring which provides an inlet to an eye of             
          said impeller, said annular inlet ring protruding outwardly in a            
          first direction from said shroud; and                                       
               a hub integrally connected to an inner end of said                     
          vanes, said hub having an integral sleeve connected thereto,                
          said sleeve protruding outwardly from said shroud in a second               
          direction, said second direction being opposite said first                  
          direction, said sleeve having an axis of rotation, said inlet               
          having a longitudinal center axis, said axis of rotation being              
          aligned with said longitudinal center axis, whereby rotation of             
          said impeller produces essentially no vibration with said                   
          impeller rotating smoothly, efficiently and substantially                   
          noise-free.                                                                 
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The references relied on by the examiner to support the                
          final rejection are:                                                        
          Botros                    5,927,947           Jul. 27, 1999                 
          Chapman                2002/0106277           Aug. 08, 2002                 

                                   THE REJECTION                                      
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as              
          being unpatentable over Chapman in view of Botros.                          

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007