Appeal No. 2005-2230
Application No. 10/120,307
As to claims 24 and 42, the examiner contends (Answer, page
4) that Zellweger discloses marking audio by adding tags.
However, the relied upon portions of Zellweger merely discuss
annotating a signal, not marking with searchable tags. Thus,
neither Rangan nor Zellweger discloses marking the signals for
later searching by adding tags. Consequently, we cannot sustain
the obviousness rejection of claims 24 and 42.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007