Ex Parte Senatore - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2272                                                        
          Application 09/791,656                                                      

          images of the area in front of the vehicle as well as images of             
          the operator of the vehicle.                                                
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  An observation and recording system for an airplane                
          comprising:                                                                 
               camera means carried by the airplane, said camera means                
          being directed at the airspace in front of the airplane and the             
          pilot of the airplane and                                                   
               means for recording images of the airspace in front of the             
          airplane and of the pilot of the airplane observed by said camera           
          means.                                                                      
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Lee                           5,742,336          Apr. 21, 1998              
          Joao                          5,917,405          Jun. 29, 1999              
          Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As                     
          evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Joao in view of Lee.            
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                        
          examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the             
          respective details thereof.                                                 
          OPINION                                                                     
          We have carefully considered the subject matter on                          
          appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence             
          of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the               
          rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                      
          consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellant’s                    
          arguments set forth in the brief along with the examiner’s                  

                                          2                                           


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007