Ex Parte Beitel et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is                  
                                              not binding precedent of the Board.                                                 



                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                         ___________                                                              
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ___________                                                              
                      Ex parte GERHARD BEITEL, ANNETTE SANGER, and WALTER HARTNER                                                 
                                                         ____________                                                             
                                                     Appeal No. 2005-2276                                                         
                                                  Application No. 09/734,467                                                      
                                                        _____________                                                             
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                        _____________                                                             

               Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.                                               
               GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               
                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                      This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-3, 7, 11-13, 15, 17, and 19-23.                     
                      The subject matter on appeal relates to a method of producing a structured layer (e.g., an                  
               electrode for a storage capacitor of an integrated memory device; see specification, page 1).  The                 
               method comprises applying a precious metal and a donor material containing an additive onto a                      
               prestructured substrate in two or more layers, heating the layers between approximately 400°C –                    
               800°C so that the additive diffuses into the precious metal to form an alloy layer, and polishing                  
               the alloy layer by chemical and mechanical means.  See specification, page 6.  This appealed                       
               subject matter is adequately represented by independent claim 1, which reads as follows:                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007