The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MARK E. WILSON, RONNY L. MOSER, DONALD E. JR. ORR, DAVID D. HALL, and DOUGLAS M. WEBEL __________ Appeal No. 2005-2267 Application No. 09/870,899 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, ADAMS, and MILLS, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6, 8, 9, 13-20, 23, 25, 41, and 71-102, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below: 1. A method of increasing the reproductive performance of a female swine, comprising the step of administering to the female swine a feed composition comprising a marine animal product; wherein the marine animal product comprises C20 and C22 omega-3 fatty acids or esters thereof; and wherein the feed composition as a final mixture comprises about 0.025% to about 2% by weight of the marine animal product. The references relied upon by the examiner are:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007