Appeal No. 2005-2418
Application 09/932,639
In summary, among the rejections of the claims on
appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 35 U.S.C. § 103, we have
sustained the respective rejections of claims 19, 20, 25, 44, 47
through 49, 52 and 54 through 56. On the other hand, we have
reversed the respective rejections of claims 30, 39, 40, 45, 53,
57 and 58. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting
various claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in con-
nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
STUART S. LEVY ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
17
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007