Ex Parte Waggoner et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                   Ex parte MARION GLEN WAGGONER, STEVE GUST COTTIS,                  
                           and MICHAEL ROBERT SAMUELS                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2005-2445                                  
                             Application No. 10/245,663                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before CAROFF, KIMLIN, and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-3, all the claims pending in appellants'              
          application.                                                                
               All of the appealed claims are directed to a molded                    
          “ovenware” part made from a heat resistant liquid crystalline               
          polymer (LCP).                                                              
               Appellants stipulate on pages 1 and 2 of their brief that              
          claims 1-3 stand or fall together for purposes of this appeal.              




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007