The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte MARION GLEN WAGGONER, STEVE GUST COTTIS, and MICHAEL ROBERT SAMUELS _____________ Appeal No. 2005-2445 Application No. 10/245,663 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before CAROFF, KIMLIN, and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges. CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3, all the claims pending in appellants' application. All of the appealed claims are directed to a molded “ovenware” part made from a heat resistant liquid crystalline polymer (LCP). Appellants stipulate on pages 1 and 2 of their brief that claims 1-3 stand or fall together for purposes of this appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007