Appeal No. 2005-2463 Application No. 10/235,443 wherein: each X is an anion; n is 1, 2 or 3 so that the total number of negative charges on said anion or anions is equal to the oxidation sate [sic: state] of a Fe atom present in (1); R1, R2 and R3 are each independently hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, substituted hydrocarbyl, or an inert functional group; R4 and R5 are each independently hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, an inert functional group or substituted hydrocarbyl; and R9, R10, R11, R14, R15 and R16 are each independently hydrogen, hydrocarbyl, an inert functional group or substituted hydrocarbyl; R8 is a primary carbon group, a secondary carbon group or a tertiary carbon group; and provided that: when R8 is a primary carbon group none, one or two of R12, R13 and R17 are primary carbon groups, and the remainder of R12, R13 and R17 are hydrogen; when R8 is a secondary carbon group, none or one of R12, R13 and R17 is a primary carbon group or a secondary carbon group and the remainder of R12, R13, and R17 are hydrogen; when R8 is a tertiary carbon group all of R12, R13 and R14 are hydrogen; and any two of R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16 and R17 vicinal to one another, taken together may form a ring. The sole reference relied upon by the examiner is: Bennett 6,214,761 B1 Apr. 10, 2001 (effective filing date Dec. 17, 1996) The sole rejection applied by the examiner against the claims is based on the judicially-created doctrine of obviousness-type 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007