Ex Parte Inoue et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2005-2508                                                              
          Application No. 09/874,314                                                        
          polymer and a specified copolymer (Brief, page 4).  These                         
          specified copolymers are useful as tackifiers for the PSA                         
          (specification, page 11, ll. 10-11).  Representative independent                  
          claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                      
                1. A sheet for protecting a paint film, said sheet                          
          comprising a substrate and formed on one side thereof a rubber-                   
          based pressure-sensitive adhesive layer which comprises a rubbery                 
          polymer and incorporated therein at least one copolymer selected                  
          from the group consisting of styrene/hydrogenated terpene                         
          copolymer resins, and hydrogenated aliphatic/aromatic copolymer                   
          petroleum resins.                                                                 
                The examiner has relied on the following references as                      
          evidence of obviousness:                                                          
          Dobashi et al. (Dobashi)          5,643,676         Jul. 01, 1997                 
          Cervellati et al. (EP ‘585)       0 273 585         Jul. 06, 1988                 
          (published European Patent Application)                                           
                Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          unpatentable over Dobashi in view of EP ‘585 (Answer, page 2).                    
          Based on the totality of the record, including appellants’                        
          arguments and evidence in the Brief and Reply Brief, as well as                   
          the opposing views of the examiner in the Answer, we affirm the                   
          rejection on appeal essentially for those reasons stated in the                   
          Answer and the reasons set forth below.                                           
          OPINION                                                                           
                The examiner finds that Dobashi discloses paint masking                     
          adhesive sheets suitable for covering automobiles, with one side                  
                                             2                                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007