Ex Parte Hanes - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2005-2559                                                                                                  
               Application No. 09/911,017                                                                                            

                                                         BACKGROUND                                                                  
                       The invention relates to scene or shot boundary detection in video data for                                   
               storage on optical storage media (e.g., DVD), for allowing a user to access the                                       
               appropriate place in the video data.  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                                     
                       1.      A method for storing scene detection information, comprising:                                         
                               identifying scene candidates from received video data;                                                
                               formatting the scene candidates for storage on optical storage media, the                             
                       optical storage media having a recordable capacity; and                                                       
                               storing the formatted scene candidates on the optical storage media in a                              
                       media structure without reducing the recordable capacity.                                                     
                       The examiner relies on the following reference:                                                               
               Dimitrova et al. (Dimitrova)                   6,137,544                      Oct. 24, 2000                           
                                                                                      (filed Jun.  2, 1997)                          
                       Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                                      
               Dimitrova.                                                                                                            
                       We refer to the Final Rejection (mailed Sep. 24, 2004) and the Examiner’s                                     
               Answer (mailed Jun. 1, 2005) for a statement of the examiner’s position and to the Brief                              
               (filed Mar. 17, 2005) and the Reply Brief (filed Jul. 5, 2005) for appellant’s position with                          
               respect to the claims which stand rejected.                                                                           






                                                                -2-                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007