The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JOB CORNELIS OOSTVEEN, WILLEM MARIE JULIA MARCEL COENE, JAN
HARM DE BOER, FRANCISCUS ANTONIUS JOHANNES KAMPERMAN, ALOYSIUS
MICHAEL JOSEPHUS MARIA SPRUIJT,
and PAULUS REINIER JOANNES VAN ROOSMALEN
________________
Appeal No. 2005-2584
Application No. 09/897,331
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before DIXON, SAADAT and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1 through 16. For the reasons stated infra we reverse the examiner’s
rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007