Appeal No. 2005-2695
Application No. 10/280,926
Similarly, we do not find that the examiner has established a prima facie case of
obviousness of dependent claims 16-18 for the reasons set forth above with respect to
independent claim 7.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 17-29 under 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph is affirmed, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 7-
12, 16-18 and 21-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph is affirmed, the decision
of the examiner to reject claims 7-12 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is reversed, and the
decision of the examiner to reject claims 16-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
16
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007