The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 113
Filed by: Motions Panel Filed:
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 3 May 2005
Mail Stop Interference
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
Tel: 571-272-9797
Fax: 571-273-0042
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
VLADIMIR M. ZAKOSHANSKY
Junior Party
(U.S. Application 08/545,092),
v.
RICHARD R. HERTZOG, STYLIANOS SIFNIADES
AND WILLIAM B. FISHER
Senior Party,
(U.S. Application 09/865,190).
_______________
Patent Interference No. 104,831
_______________
Before: SPIEGEL, GARDNER LANE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT - No Interference-in-Fact - Bd.R. 127(a)
(Revised Judgment)
The Judgment (Paper No. 111) is vacated. The Judgment itself did not identify those
claims found unpatentable in the Decision on Preliminary Motions (Interference No. 104,831,
Paper No. 110). Further, we note that the Judgment (Paper No. 111) incorrectly identified
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007