Petersen et al. V. Ikemoto et al. - Page 2


                  Interference 105,075 Paper 69                                                                                 

                         Upon consideration of Petersen Preliminary Motions 1-3, Petersen Miscellaneous                         
                  Motion 4, Ikemoto Preliminary Motions 1-3, Ikemoto Motion to Correct Inventorship,                            
                  and for the reasons given in the DECISION ON PRELIMINARY MOTIONS (Papers 67                                   
                  and 68), it is:                                                                                               
                         ORDERED that Petersen Preliminary Motions 1-3 and Miscellaneous Motion 4                               
                  (Papers 23, 24, 25, and 26) are dismissed.                                                                    
                         FURTHER ORDERED that Ikemoto Motion to Correct'Inventorship (Paper 46)                                 
                  is granted.                                                                                                   
                         FURTHER ORDERED that Ikemoto Preliminary Motion I (Paper 29) is                                        
                  dismissed.                                                                                                    
                         FURTHER ORDERED that Ikemoto Preliminary Motion 2 (Paper 50) is                                        
                  denied.                                                                                                       
                         FURTHER ORDERED that Ikemoto Preliminary Motion 3 (Paper 5 1) is                                       
                  granted.                                                                                                      
                         FURTHER ORDERED that Petersen is not entitled to a patent containing                                   
                  Petersen claims 6 and 7 of involved Petersen application 09/794,755, filed February 26,                       
                  2001.                                                                                                         
                         FURTHER ORDERED that entry of this judgment constitutes a final decision in                            
                  this interference [37 CFR §41.2--definition of "final" --reprinted in 69 Fed. Reg. at 50003                   
                  (Aug. 12, 2004)].                                                                                             
                         FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of each DECISION ON PRELIMINARY                                            
                  MOTIONS (Papers 67 and 68) and this JUDGMENT shall be placed in the file of (1)                               
                  application 09/794,755 and (2) application 10/086,076.                                                        










                                                              2                                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007