junior party Lutz Gissman. FURTHER ORDERED that junior party Lutz Gissman is not entitled to a patent containing claims 23-34 (corresponding to Count 1) of application 09/162,904. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of application 09/162,904 and patent 5,985,610. FURTHER ORDERED that as the parties have stated that there is a settlement agreement, the parties shall direct attention to compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205(a) [see former rules 37 CFR §1.661 and §1.666]. /Richard E. Schafer/ ) RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) /Sally C. Medley/ ) BOARD OF PATENT SALLY C. MEDLEY ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) /James T. Moore/ ) INTERFERENCES JAMES T. MOORE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) August 12, 2005 Alexandria, VAPage: Previous 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007