LEIBU V. Fletcher et al. - Page 2




                    Interference No.  105,180                                                                                                                                   
                    Fletcher v.  Leibu                                                                                                                                          
                               On January 13, 2005, junior party Fletcher filed a paper conceding priority of the subject                                                       
                    matter of the count to senior party Leibu.  It is now appropriate for entry of adverse judgment                                                             
                    against party Fletcher.                                                                                                                                     
                               It is                                                                                                                                            
                               ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter Count 1 is herein entered against the                                                             
                    junior party PAUL R.  FLETCHER, CRAIG A.  LEWIS and GREGORY J.  BELLINGTON,                                                                                 
                    and thus the junior party PAUL R.  FLETCHER, CRAIG A.  LEWIS and GREGORY J.                                                                                 
                    BELLINGTON is not entitled to its application claims 1-9, 11-15, 18-20, 22-24, and 36-38                                                                    
                    which correspond to the count;                                                                                                                              
                               FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note                                                                 
                    the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.  Rule 205; and                                                                                               
                               FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be filed in the respective involved                                                                 
                    application or patent of the parties.                                                                                                                       














                                                                                       2                                                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007