Interference 105,192 Paper 94
Stice v. Campbell
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement, the
attentions of the parties are directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and
37 CFR § 41.205.
___________________________________)
FRED E. McKELVEY )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
___________________________________)PATENT APPEALS
SALLY GARDNER LANE ) AND
Administrative Patent Judge )INTERFERENCES
)
)
) TRIAL SECTION
___________________________________) MERITS PANEL
MARK NAGUMO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Alexandria, VA
11 February 2005
cc: via first class mail:
Counsel for Stice: Counsel for Campbell:
Ronald A. Daignault, Esq. Kenneth J. Meyers, Esq.
MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C. FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
1101 30th Street, N.W., GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Suite 500 1300 I Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20007 Suite 700
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202-625-8380
Fax: 202-625-8381 Phone: 202-408-4000
Fax: 202-408-4400
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: November 3, 2007