THIS DOCUMENT WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
AND IS NOT BINDING PRECEDENT OF THE BOARD
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Paper No. 176
Mail Stop INTERFERENCE Entered June 8, 2005
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
United States Patent and Trademark Office
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
KARL L. GINTER, VICTOR H. SHEAR,
FRANCES J. SPAHN and DAVID M. VAN WIE
Junior Party
(Patents 5,920,861; 5,982,891; 6,138,119 and 6,253,193)1
v.
GREG BENSON, GREGORY H. URICH
and CHRISTOPHER L. KNAUFT
Senior Party
(Applications 09/164,606 and 09/321,286)2
_______________
Patent Interference No. 105,193
_______________
Before LEE, MOORE and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
Judgment – Bd. Rule 127
On April 11, 2005, the Board issued a decision on priority in this case. (Paper No. 173)
Thereafter, each party was authorized to file a motion, by May 12, 2005, to designate certain
claims as corresponding to the count or to designate certain claims as not corresponding to the
1
Based on applications 08/805,804, 08/964,333, 09/300,778, and 09/208,017, respectively. The earliest accorded
benefit date is February 13, 1995, the filing date of application 08/388,107. The real party in interest is InterTrust
Technologies Corp.
2
Benson’s earliest accorded benefit date is February 1, 1995, the filing date of Swedish priority application
9500355-4. The real party in interest is Macrovision Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007