On 17 March 2005, counsel for Melanson informed board personnel that Melanson would not respond to the show cause order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1 at 5) is awarded against junior party JOHN LAURENCE MELANSON . FURTHER ORDERED that junior party JOHN LAURENCE MELANSON is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-3 and 7-9 (corresponding to Count 1 - Paper 39) of U.S. patent 6,259,317. FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files of application 10/191,753 and U.S. Patent 6,259,317. FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd.R. 205. cc (via email): Attorney for Melanson: Mr. Louis Hoffman, Esq. (lead counsel) Mr. Steven Lin, Esq. (backup counsel) ljh@patentit.com legal@crystal.cirrus.com Attorney for Strickland: Mr. Scott Watkins, Esq. (lead counsel) Mr. D. Douglas Price, Esq. (backup counsel) swatkins@steptoe.com dprice@steptoe.com -2-Page: Previous 1 2Last modified: November 3, 2007