MOORE et al. V. Yang et al. - Page 2


                                               00                                                                                                            



                       unpatentable. Accordingly, a count cannot be formulated,                                                                              

                       and it is inappropriate to continue to the priority                                        phase of                                   

                       this     interference.             Therefore, it is:                                                                                  
                                ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count                                                                      

                       1 (Paper 1, p. 5) is awarded against both parties;                                                                                    
                                FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, SHUNONG YANG,                                                                             

                       WILLIAM F. McCOY, and ANTHONY W. DALLMIER is not entitled                                             to                              
                       a patent containing Claims 1-37 of patent 6,423,267 Bl;                                                                               
                                FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, ROBERT M. MOORE and                                                                       

                       CHRISTOPHER J. NALEPA is not entitled                              to a patent containing                                             
                       Claims 61-70 of application 09/451,319;                                                                                               

                                FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this                            judgment be made of                                           

                       record in the files                of application 09/451,319 and patent                                                               

                       6,423,267 Bi;                                                                                                                         
                                FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement                                                                              

                       agreement which has not been filed,                            attention is directed to                                               
                       35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 41.205.                                                                                               


                                                 /Richard E. Schafer/                                                                                        
                                                 RICHARD E. SCHAFER                                                                                          
                                                 Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                 
                                                 /Romulo H. Delmendo/                                     BOARD OF PATENT                                    
                                                 ROMULO H. DELMENDO                                                                                          
                                                 Administrative Patent Judge                                 APPEALS AND                                     

                                                 /James T. Moore/                                         INTERFERENCES                                      
                                                 JAMES T. MOORE                                                                                              
                                                 Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                 




                                                                           2                                                                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007