Interference No. 105,229
Davis v. Saito
Judgment – Bd. Rule 127(b)
Senior party Saito has requested entry of adverse judgment (Paper No. 58) with respect
to the subject matter of Counts 1, 3 and 4, which are all of the pending counts. The request is
granted. It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is herein entered against
senior party MAKOTO SAITO;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party MAKOTO SAITO is not entitled to claim 32
of its involved application 09/097,877, which corresponds to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 3 is herein
entered against senior party MAKOTO SAITO;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party MAKOTO SAITO is not entitled to claims 14-
21 and claims 23-29 of its involved application 09/097,877, which correspond to Count 3;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 4 is herein
entered against senior party MAKOTO SAITO;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party MAKOTO SAITO is not entitled to claims 22,
30, and 31 of its involved application 09/097,877, which correspond to Count 4;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party DEREK L. DAVIS is not entitled to claims 4
and 13 of its involved Patent 5,805,706, pursuant to an agreement reached by junior party’s
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007