Interference No. 105,263
Matsushita v. Sakaguchi
Junior party Matsushita filed a paper conceding priority to the senior party as to the
subject matter of the count. (Paper No. 29) Junior party Matsushita also filed Substantive
Motion 1 seeking to designate its involved claims 6, 7 and 9 as not corresponding to the count.
The motion has been denied. (Paper No. 40) The concession of priority is treated as a request
for entry of adverse judgment. The request is herein granted.
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of Count 1 is entered against junior
party TAKESHI MATSUSHITA and HIROSHI TAYANAKA;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party TAKESHI MATSUSHITA and HIROSHI
TAYANAKA is not entitled to its patent claims 1-7 and 9-11 which correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, the parties should note
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and Bd. Rule 205; and
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be placed in the respective
involved application or patent of the parties.
-2-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007